The FBI is carrying out
"unwarranted investigations for religious or political reasons,"
according to the American
Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which charges that "the agency
has sunk back into the kind of political monitoring it did in the 1960s
and 1970s."
The Washington-based advocacy group said a series of FBI
inquiries across the country shows that the agency is conducting
investigations based on the targets' political activities or religious
affiliations.
Representing 14 individuals and nine organizations, the ACLU
has filed requests under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act seeking
access to any investigative files the FBI may have on them. The ACLU
also has filed a separate request for information on FBI
investigations, particularly on Muslim individuals and organizations
Although most of the requests were filed in St. Louis, ACLU affiliates
and branches in Rhode Island, Idaho, and Kentucky also have filed
similar requests.
Among others who filed the information requests are peace
activist Bill Ramsey, peace activist and Holocaust survivor Hedy
Epstein, and American Muslim magazine editor Sheila
Musaji.
Organizations include those that were opposed to the Iraq
invasion, a group advocating for workers' rights and environmental
issues, as well as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).
The ACLU says the FBI's conduct is "eerily reminiscent" of the
days of J. Edgar Hoover, the agency's controversial first director. In
the 1950s, the FBI went after alleged communists and "fellow
travelers." In the 1960s, the target was the anti-Vietnam peace
movement.
Meanwhile, the ACLU and another advocacy group, Human Rights
Watch (HRW), charged in a new study that the George W.
Bush administration has perverted the system of due process "beyond
recognition" in jailing at least 70 terror suspects as "material
witnesses" since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The groups are calling
on Congress to impose tougher safeguards.
The report, released Monday, found that the 70 suspects
¡V 25 percent of them U.S. citizens and all but one Muslim men
¡V were jailed for weeks or months at a time in U.S. facilities
without being charged with a crime.
Seven men have since been charged with supporting terrorism,
and four have been convicted to date, the report said.
It charges that many of the men who were held as material
witnesses were "thrust into a Kafkaesque world of indefinite detention
without charges, secret evidence, and baseless accusations."
The new report reflects an effort by civil rights groups to
expand the current PATRIOT Act debate to a range of other legal tools
that the Bush administration is using in its campaign against
terrorism.
More- http://www.antiwar.com/ips/fisher.php?articleid=6466
The return of '1984'
By H.D.S. Greenway | June 24, 2005
IF YOU TAKE something to read at the beach this summer make
sure it is not one of George Orwell's books. The comparison with
current events will ruin your day.
In what was then the futuristic, nightmare world of ''1984,"
written in 1949, Orwell introduced the concepts of ''newspeak,"
''doublethink," and ''the mutability of the past," all concepts that
seem to be alive and well in 2005, half a century after Orwell's death.
In the ever-changing rationale of why we went to war in Iraq, we can
imagine ourselves working in Orwell's ''Ministry of Truth," in which
''reality control" is used to ensure that ''the lie passed into history
and became the truth."
And what about the Bush administration's insistence that all
is going well in Iraq? In the Ministry of Truth, statistics are
adjustable to suit politics -- ''merely the substitution of one piece
of nonsense for another," Orwell wrote. ''Most of the material that you
were dealing with had no connection to anything in the real world, not
even the kind of connection that is contained in a direct lie.
Statistics were just as much a fantasy in their original version as in
the rectified version." Welcome to the Iraq war, Mr. Orwell.
What of Donald Rumsfeld's newspeak, or was it doublethink,
saying that ''no detention facility in the history of warfare has been
more transparent" than Guantanamo? We have the FBI's word for it that
prisoners were chained hand and foot in a fetal position to the floor,
left for 18 to 24 hours with no food and no water, left to defecate and
urinate on themselves.
The deaths by torture in Abu Ghraib and Afghanistan sound very
much like what happens in Orwell's fictional torture chamber: Room 101.
He might as well have been writing about the Bush
administration's redefinition of torture when he wrote about using
''logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it."
In Orwell's profoundly pessimistic view: ''Political language
. . . is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable,
and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind."
There is something profoundly Orwellian, too, about the
administration's attempts to impose thought control on public
broadcasting. The sometimes secret machinations to place impositions on
editorial freedom, the efforts to see which people interviewed by Bill
Moyers might be considered anti-Bush or anti-Defense Department or
insufficiently conservative, were just the kind of efforts to squash
intellectual opposition to state power that Orwell wrote about.
I was amused to see even a conservative Republican senator,
Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, was branded as a ''liberal" because he dared
criticize the Pentagon -- a ''thought criminal" in Orwell's parlance.
The drum beat by some conservatives to bring down an
independent judiciary is another case in point. We learned from the
case of unfortunate, blind, and brain-dead Terri Schiavo that it isn't
activist judges who are the enemy. It is judges who are not active in
the correct causes.
More- http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_
opinion/oped/articles/2005/06/24/the_return_of_1984/
LATEST HEADLINES
Refresh Frequently --
Updated throughout the day
| Mencken
sense ... |
'I believe that no discovery of fact, however trivial, can be wholly
useless to the race, and that no trumpeting of falsehood, however
virtuous in intent, can be anything but vicious. I believe that all
government is evil, in that all government must necessarily make war
upon liberty.' ~ H.L. Mencken
|
| YOU
KNOW IT MAKES SENSE ... |
|
|